New originality check
Your past checks 0
No checks yet. Your reports will appear here.
No checks match your search or filters.
Inside every check
Compare matching words and passages with the sources found.
Inspect passages that follow a source in meaning and structure.
Review the signals in context, with sentence-level highlighting.
See which references resolve to indexed scholarly works.
Inspect file metadata, hidden text and other document signals.
Review writing suggestions while protecting citations and key terms.
A world of evidence.
Coming into focus.
Preparing your document…
StartingProgress follows the reported analysis stages.
- Reading the document
- Understanding structure
- Searching world literature
- Scanning the citation canon
- Retrieving source texts
- Comparing against sources
- Checking AI authorship
- Compiling your report
Results appear when the analysis finishes.
Evidence,
brought to light.
Explore the sources in your report.
Review sources and context.These signals are investigative leads, not verdicts.
Coverage of this scan
Review and improve your manuscript
Review suggestions for matched and AI-flagged passages while protecting citations, numbers, equations and names. Compare the changes before exporting your revised manuscript.
Exhibits — matched sources
Near misses — below threshold, shown so nothing is hidden
Paraphrase similarity — passages for review
Meaning-level similarity to retrieved sources, considered alongside wording and attribution. Related ideas do not establish copying, misconduct or AI use.
Manuscript heatmap
AI authorship — section strip
Raw AI detector signals (uncalibrated — the headline AI score comes from the calibrated detector)
Citation integrity — reference tracing
Parsed references are checked against Crossref and OpenAlex within this scan's budget. Missing index records, access failures and metadata differences require review; an unresolved reference is not proof of fabrication.
Document forensics — the file itself
Inspect export metadata, timestamps and text visibility. Browser exports and searchable OCR layers can be legitimate. These observations do not establish who wrote the text or whether an anomaly was deliberate.